When heads of corporations have to school the courts and congress on the damage corporate campaign donations do, perhaps the system's a little bit broken?
And by the by, if the court was hoping for a way to further marginalize and discourage people from voting, they've hit the mother lode.
I am pleased to note that Justice Stevens seems to have gotten under Chief Justice Roberts's skin just a weeeee bit on the matter of how the corporate fundraising decision was reached, which makes me wonder if perhaps some modicum of of shame lurks beneath all the pro-corporation rah-rah covered by Roberts' robes.
And a letter writer to the NY Times this morning suggested that, rather than fundraising, congressmembers should simply sell naming rights to their seats, so that, for example, the junior senator from North Carolina would be called The Bank of America senator--at least for the term of the naming right.
I sometimes feel like I'm living in a dystopian novel.
And by the by, if the court was hoping for a way to further marginalize and discourage people from voting, they've hit the mother lode.
I am pleased to note that Justice Stevens seems to have gotten under Chief Justice Roberts's skin just a weeeee bit on the matter of how the corporate fundraising decision was reached, which makes me wonder if perhaps some modicum of of shame lurks beneath all the pro-corporation rah-rah covered by Roberts' robes.
And a letter writer to the NY Times this morning suggested that, rather than fundraising, congressmembers should simply sell naming rights to their seats, so that, for example, the junior senator from North Carolina would be called The Bank of America senator--at least for the term of the naming right.
I sometimes feel like I'm living in a dystopian novel.